It's time for a change, for something new to be added to the Contact Center Technology Suite. Currently, there are at least 70 manufacturers of what might be called Case Management Systems for customer contact centers. A good CMS resource is a requirement for any customer contact center that wants to be effective. However, the implementation and use of a CMS application, while it can help you to manage cases, will not guarantee effective management of the center itself. It's time for a change; are you ready to be a part of it?
The process whereby a company selects contact center technology tools, such as a case management system, is clearly broken. The deck is stacked against success. The functionality that is most needed, that would help centers to be run effectively and profitably -- and their customers to be properly served, is not even being offered. It's time for a change, a new approach. What the industry needs is a better way to select and deploy customer contact center management technology, one that will be focused on profitability and enable authentic customer centricity.
Many companies these days want to be perceived as being "Customer Centric." The rewards of customer loyalty supposedly to be gained through attaining such status certainly seem impressive. It's understandable that senior management teams and contact center executives would want to jump on the bandwagon and talk of customer centricity initiatives of their own. Unfortunately, the moves being made and the path being followed are mostly transaction centric rather than truly being about a mutually profitable and therefore continuing relationship between company and customer.
Despite the advances in contact center technology, especially the new and highly configurable On Demand / SaaS systems, the cost for implementation of the tools can still be a significant if not the major portion of the total budget. Why? It's typically not the fault of the implementation firm; they deliver what they are asked to produce. The problem is at the customer end of the deal, where system specifications are done without regard to overall corporate profitability goals.